Myassignment.live is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Trade protectionism includes the policy which is used to protect the domestic industries from the competition which is unfair from the foreign industries. The primary tools which are included are tariffs, subsidies, quotas and manipulation in currencies. It is considered as the motivated defensive measure. This report includes the linkages between the issues of trade protectionism, market power, and income inequality. It includes the analysis of protectionism that helps in increasing the power of big issues. Protectionism will be discussed which leads to lowering inequality. Market power influences the inequalities in a way that affects the market. In the case of protectionism, market power leads the business in making a competitive advantage. Inequalities will be discussed which pushes people towards protectionism.
There are policies that help big businesses in increasing the power in the market. The protectionist strategy helps in enacting the tariffs in tax imports. It raises the imported goods prices and at the time of comparing the same with the local goods, it becomes less competitive. The countries which deal with imports of goods on a large scale get the benefits more. Big business gets the market power with protectionism with the help of tariffs as the tax and duties which are imposed on the import of goods are included in tariffs (Wright and Lansbury, 2014). In the domestic markets, tariffs increase the prices of goods which are imported and it also reduces the demand for the same.
Trade protectionism is beneficial for big businesses as it includes the quotas restrict the import volume of some particular goods or services for some period of time. It is also known as the non-tariff trade barriers. This constraint on export cause the major increase in price of the goods which are imported
Protectionism is beneficial for making power for big businesses as the economy requires to adopt the protectionist policies which help in encouraging the domestic investment for the industries. Foreign import of products also encourages the producers in domestic market for making the investment in resources. In order to make the power, trade protectionism helps the big businesses in providing growth opportunities and it provides the local industries to grow in market and opportunities are provided for competing with the experienced companies in the overseas market (Wilkins, 2014).
It includes the objective of protecting a nation with the help of economic interests like the industries, commodities and work employments. It helps in stimulating the growth of economics and creates wealth in the border of the nation. Government pays the subsidy to domestic producers. This can be cash payments, low-interest loans, tax breaks, and government ownership of common stocks in domestic companies. Domestic producers take the benefit of subsidy by providing additional cash to produce goods in which reducing manufacturing costs and allow the industries for winning the market in foreign (Solodkovska and Olefirenko, 2014).
Big business gets the subsidies and local content requirements as it decreases in imports with the help of requirements of manufacturing of product parts are done domestically. The controls in exchange rate help in making the products cheap in the nation by lowering the currency value in the market of the exchange rate. Trade protectionism makes the power of big businesses as it includes that a country for selling the currency in the foreign exchange market so that it depreciates against other currencies. This will lead to an increase in import prices while reducing export costs. It help the country like developing and developed for increasing the chance of selling the products are services in the foreign market (Meschi and Vivarelli, 2009).
Trade protectionism helps in increasing the power of big businesses in a manner for increasing the growth in the economy. Trade protectionism helps big businesses in generating high employment rates with the domestic boosting for their workforces (Khan and Vaheesan, 2017). The increase in market power leads to increasing monopsony power in the market of labor.
Overall, the evidence suggests an increasing concentration at the industry level. In the United States, this trend seems particularly strong. However, the debate is still ongoing as to whether the evidence is strong enough to show that market power is also increasing and that competition in the broadest sense has decreased. Protectionism increases the power of big businesses by protecting the consumers for unsafe imported products (Datt, et al., 2011). The security of nation is considered as the policies of trade protectionist because of the industries includes the defense related industries and the producers of food.
In countries, protectionism leads to a high level of inequality which increases the pressure on protectionists. Measuring trade protectionist pressures can be difficult, but the vast majority of evidence requiring trade protectionist policies suggests that Western countries have a wide range of trends in this direction. In addition to the unexpected victory of Trump and Brexit, examples of protectionist leaders and political groups include Gail Wilders of the Netherlands, the Northern League of Italy, the National Front of France and the Orr of Hungary (Georgiadis and Gräb, 2016). One of the reasons often cited is the increase in local inequality. Compared to trade gains, the pattern of technological returns is even more directly determined by policy. Over the past four decades, patents, copyrights, and related protection have been greatly enhanced and extended. It required to consider the extended from 55 to 95 years (Bussière, et al., 2011). Perhaps even more importantly, the law has become more friendly to holders of these property claims, tending to litigate in favor of their legal procedures, and the courts have become more friendly to patents and more severely penalized for violations. Tariffs in the country lowering the growth and raising the inequality levels.
Prices vary due to trading barriers, a distribution effect that favors certain factors and is not conducive to other factors. For example, if trade reforms are introduced, protection will be reduced and trade prices will, therefore, be reduced imported goods, developing countries will be able to concentrate their production on commodities focus on using its rich elements and import other cheap goods (Durante, et al., 2018). Therefore, trade is expected to lead to an increase in demand, thereby increasing the actual return of unskilled labor. Therefore, unskilled workers in the countries which are developing required the benefits.
When two countries are involved in the trading, each country is required to export a set of goods which intensively uses abundant factors. The factors which are abundant are considered as the lower prices which helps in creating the specialization pattern which is based on the abundances of countries. In this order, the countries become different from each other for the distribution of endowments.
The unskilled labor-intensive inputs of different counties are required to focus on the skill abundant of the developed countries (Cottier, 2014). Protectionism does not fix the inequalities and the industries are affected because of inequalities in trading.
Market power includes the abilities of the industries in order to raise profitability and raise the prices of products in the market. The market power of products includes the sources which are required to be eliminated as it includes the desires for providing the sustained incentives to innovate.
In a certain market power degree is an important stimulus to investment, which is considered as the competition law usually does not prohibit market power, but “abuses” the reasons for restricting competition. It is analyzed that the market power influences in creating inequality economically (Evenett and Fritz, 2015). With the rise in wealth and inequality of income, the changes in the market power and concentration make the growth and protectionism in an effective manner. The power of business in the international market leads to the protectionism. It is necessary for the business to follow the policies for protecting the unfair competition in the foreign market.
There is a reason to believe that the overall impact of illegal or poor market power is important. Many of the company's anti-competitive behaviors are hidden. On the other hand, the commercial activities of the cartels which are discovered have shown a wide range of affected sectors. Considering the indicted and undiscovered cartels, and assuming that the cartels that have been discovered and not found have comparable economic trade, believes that the cartel trade may reach about $2 trillion a year, while the cartel's counter Competitive price increases range from $200-600 billion per year (Chalkual, et al., 2013). Inequality in the market is considered as the hidden cost of market power. Market power majorly influences inequality. The gains of market power influence inequality as the competition in market is considered mixed.
In case of market power, every country is required to consider the differences in the growth rate of the country (all industries) and the minimum mark-up rate reflecting the most competitive economic best practices. Further, explain the following methods; The aim is to recognize the need to substantially increase fares to cover the necessary benefits. Legal sources of investment and market power influence inequalities such as patents and trademarks.
Market forces will exaggerate the prices of different baskets of goods at the same percentage. This means that poor people's products and wealthy products will also be affected by Market power. To a certain extent, the poor are more likely to be monopolized provide a conservative lower bound estimate (Irwin, 2015).
The indicator of market power includes the return on capital. Mark-ups are considered which includes the imperfect measuring of competition. It is observed that for the problems of measurement with the various inputs and outputs at the sectoral level (Alsamawi, et al., 2017). For measuring the strength of the competition, the mark-ups are commonly used. The mark-ups are estimated for calculating the different sectors in which the actual mark-up and lowest mark-up are calculated.
The increase in wealth and income inequality creates the political debate and also creates issues like concentration, market power, and bigness. It is analyzed that there is a connection between inequality and market concentration. The share in income includes the corresponds of labor into the total income or. It is earned through labor, mainly in the way of wages. The various measures which are used includes the adjusted according to self-employment, the reward is not defined as salary, but it requires to be considered as the labor income (Sturm and De Haan, 2015).
Yes, somehow market power leads to protectionism. If the market has the power of not leading anyone in the market than the domestic industries can shield from the foreign competition by taxing imports. Market power can be defined as the ability of the companies to maintain and raise the price above which helps in prevailing them under the higher competition. There are the many ways through which the market power can be raised such as by engaging the predictor pricing, creation of overcapacity, product tying and with the other barriers to entry (Osabouhien, et al., 2014). When any company has substantial market shares and is controlling the market then, it is called market power. The market power of any company has the power to affect the overall pricing in the market.
Market power leads to protectionism if the domestic market has the power to control the overall market and they have the power to set the prices accordingly than the foreign competition will not even enter that market. If there will be market power than subsidies, tariffs, import quotas, etc. Market power means high level of domestic consumptions of products and avoiding the use of foreign market products (Irwin, 2017). So this technique of using domestic products and lead the market through domestic products leads to protectionism. Market power means doing the free trade, prices are set higher, make the use of resources in an efficient way, provide employment to the workers, etc.
As the market power is to enhance the trade which results in the protectionism as it increases the cost and uncertainty and results in the destructive trade. Market power brings more growth opportunities so it also helps the domestic market in enhancing their market power as protectionism restricts the tariffs on imported goods (Nguyen, 2017). Market power is also attained through government regulations if they are made in favor of that. So protectionism protects the rights of market by making the rules and regulations in the favoring of the government.
The market power sometimes also does the loss of economic welfare and reduced output and protectionism lead to maintain the economy of country. If the market price is raised above the marginal cost of the goods and services than it results in the market power and in the protectionism when the tariffs are imposed than the competition of foreign competition will reduce which can offer the prices at the lower cost (Mahadevan, et al., 2017). So ultimately if the choices will not be much for the consumers they will have to buy the product at the higher prices only. So the market power leads to protectionism to restrain the imports and to protect certain industries of the market.
Yes, inequality pushes people towards protectionism. The major reason behind that is gap between the rich and the poor people and even the inequality in the income which has tragic consequences for the global economy. In the world the growth rates have become mediocre the developed countries are not able to compensate the economic growth for the developing countries. The growth country also differs country to country as free trade pacts are majorly critiqued. Even the gap between the man and women also results in protectionism as the yawning gap between the individual fortunes awes increasing (Ma and Lu, 2011).
When inequality rises the tariffs increases and it results in protectionism. If there will be equality than no tariffs will be increased and protectionism can be reduced. Even the inequality in trade liberalization and the exacerbate globalization also results in the leading to protectionism. The inequality in income leads to the trade agreements and this is the main cause that protectionism is increasing (Morley and Ablett, 2017). Even the change in technology causes many changes in the free trade which results in lowering the cost of goods and services. If the compensation has been provided to the economic losers than inequality can be reduced and trade agreements can be made better.
So it was analyzed that the change in the technological and the change in the internet things brings inequality which also causes protectionism. If the change in the technological change is higher than the inequality is also higher but if the change in the technology is lower than inequality will also be lower. The trade is also not rising due to the change in the labor market (Park and Shin, 2017). The updated technologies have reduced the uses of the labor in the market which results in protectionism. If there will be sufficient labor required than the protectionism will not be lead.
The government tries to reduce inequality by promoting equity so that protectionism can be detected. Inequality in the market raises the prices of the market products instead of lowering them so protectionism causes due to the inequality in the market too. If there is inequality in the income of the consumer then customer choices will get limited to the lower products only (Foellmi and Zweimüller, 2014). The higher-income people can afford any products but for the lower-income people, only the cheapest products are preferable.
The inequality in education also causes lead to the protectionism as if there is a deficiency in understanding the tariffs system and the tax system than it leads to the slower growth of the economy. If the people are not educated than inequality level raises and results in increasing the output trends which will decline the growth of the economic expansion. Inequality also leads to the protectionism as the differences in education also cause a change in the preferences (Australian Government-Productivity Commission, 2017). The qualified person always goes for the quality product whether it is of the high prices but if the person is undereducated than it will not go for the quality products and which leads to protectionism.
In order to conclude, it is analyzed that trade protectionism, market power, and income inequality are linked with each other. Trade protectionism includes the strategy for protecting the economy from trading in the international market. The various methods are included in trade protectionism with the goal of protecting the well-being of the nation are tariffs, quotas, and subsidies. Protectionism leads to make inequality higher in the market. Market power leads to an influence on the inequality in the industries and nation which creates more competition and affects the economy. It is also concluded that the increase in tariffs of trade protectionism helps in rising the inequality. Inequality pushes people in an effective manner towards protectionism. The causes of protectionism include the change in technologies. Protectionism is required to be protected and the government takes the initiative for protecting in a manner.
Alsamawi, A., McBain, D., Murray, J., Lenzen, M. and Wiebe, K.S., 2017. The inequality footprints of nations; A novel approach to quantitative accounting of income inequality. The social footprints of global trade (pp. 69-91). Springer, Singapore.
Australian Government-Productivity Commission, 2017. Rising protectionism: Challenges, threats and opportunities for Australia. Productivity Commission Research Paper.
Bussière, M., Pérez?Barreiro, E., Straub, R. and Taglioni, D., 2011. Protectionist responses to the crisis: Global trends and implications. The World Economy, 34(5), pp.826-852.
Chalkual, T., Peng, J., Liang, S. and Ju, Y., 2013. Trade Policies and Economic Growth. Deakin Papers on International Business Economics, 6, pp.33-45.
Cottier, T., 2014. International economic law in transition from trade liberalization to trade regulation. Journal of international economic law, 17(3), pp.671-677.
Datt, M., Hoekman, B. and Malouche, M., 2011. Taking stock of trade protectionism since 2008.
Durante, F., Fiske, S.T., Kervyn, N., Cuddy, A.J., Akande, A.D., Adetoun, B.E., Adewuyi, M.F., Tserere, M.M., Al Ramiah, A., Mastor, K.A. and Barlow, F.K., 2018. Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. In Social Cognition (pp. 246-268). Routledge.
Evenett, S.J. and Fritz, J., 2015. The Tide Turns? Trade Protectionism, and Slowing Global Growth. The 18th GTA Report.
Foellmi, R. and Zweimüller, J., 2014. Inequality, market power, and product diversity. Economics Letters, 82(1), pp.139-145.
Georgiadis, G. and Gräb, J., 2016. Growth, real exchange rates and trade protectionism since the financial crisis. Review of International Economics, 24(5), pp.1050-1080.
Irwin, D.A., 2015. Free trade under fire. Princeton University Press.
Irwin, D.A., 2017. The false promise of protectionism: why Trump's trade policy could backfire. Foreign Aff., 96, p.45.
Khan, L.M. and Vaheesan, S., 2017. Market power and inequality: The antitrust counterrevolution and its discontents. Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev., 11, p.235.
Ma, J. and Lu, Y., 2011. Free trade or protection: a literature review on trade barriers. Research in World Economy, 2(1), p.69.
Mahadevan, R., Nugroho, A. and Amir, H., 2017. Do inward looking trade policies affect poverty and income inequality? Evidence from Indonesia's recent wave of rising protectionism. Economic Modelling, 62, pp.23-34.
Meschi, E. and Vivarelli, M., 2009. Trade and income inequality in developing countries. World development, 37(2), pp.287-302.
Morley, C. and Ablett, P., 2017. Rising wealth and income inequality: A radical social work critique and response. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(2), p.6.
Nguyen, Q., 2017. “Mind the Gap?” Rising income inequality and individual trade policy preferences. European Journal of Political Economy, 50, pp.92-105.
Osabouhien, E., Efobi, U.R. and Beecroft, I., 2014. Free trade, protectionism and the balance of trade: New empirical insights. Beggar-Thy-Poor-Neighbour: Crisis-Era Protectionism and Developing Countries, pp.13-24.
Park, D. and Shin, K., 2017. Economic growth, financial development, and income inequality. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(12), pp.2794-2825.
Solodkovska, G. and Olefirenko, V., 2014. Ways of improvement of non-tariff measures of international trade regulation. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 36(4), pp.966-976.
Sturm, J.E. and De Haan, J., 2015. Income inequality, capitalism, and ethno-linguistic fractionalization. American Economic Review, 105(5), pp.593-97.
Wilkins, R., 2014. Evaluating the Evidence on Income Inequality in Australia in the 2000s. Economic Record, 90(288), pp.63-89.
Wright, C.F. and Lansbury, R.D., 2014. Trade unions and economic reform in Australia, 1983–2013. The Singapore Economic Review, 59(04), p.1450033.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2022). Accounting Principles II. Retrieved from https://myassignment.live/free-samples/acct2023-accounting-principles-ii/financial-statements-of-the-business-file-A1D39FE.html.
"Accounting Principles II." My Assignment Help, 2022, https://myassignment.live/free-samples/acct2023-accounting-principles-ii/financial-statements-of-the-business-file-A1D39FE.html.
My Assignment Help (2022) Accounting Principles II [Online]. Available from: https://myassignment.live/free-samples/acct2023-accounting-principles-ii/financial-statements-of-the-business-file-A1D39FE.html
[Accessed 06 September 2022].
My Assignment Help. 'Accounting Principles II' (My Assignment Help, 2022) < https://myassignment.live/free-samples/acct2023-accounting-principles-ii/financial-statements-of-the-business-file-A1D39FE.html> accessed 06 September 2022.
My Assignment Help. Accounting Principles II [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2022 [cited 06 September 2022]. Available from: https://myassignment.live/free-samples/acct2023-accounting-principles-ii/financial-statements-of-the-business-file-A1D39FE.html.
Are you confident that you will achieve the grade?
Our best Expert will help you improve your grade
If you are the original writer of this content and no longer wish to have your work published on Myassignment.live then please raise the content removal request.